Re: [Boston.pm] test::something that captures/hide expected stderr
Bill Ricker via Boston-pm <[email protected]> Mon, 7 Mar 2022 21:49:00 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.perl-mongers.boston |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAbKA3V-H+9cbNeXA5rOXyB5LQxVghzUm=iQVqYcEQ_aCooS-Q@mail.gmail.com> |
> I'm using Test::More, but I'm not attached. That legacy API has been reimplemented on Test2 internals, so a lot of folks are moving to Test2::* API. But there's nothing /wrong/ with Test::More. On 07/03/2022 19:03, email-2Ro/Dj86MvDSUeElwK9/[email protected] wrote: > > Another issue I'm running into is that I'm doing a lot of negative > testing. > > I'm testing a module I wrote and making sure it errors out when given > > bad data. > Good! On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 2:16 PM David Cantrell <[email protected]> wrote: > The best tool for this is Capture::Tiny. > I won't disagree with David. IDK if my team's testing gury will be on the Boston.PM virtual meeting Tuesday but you can bring questions about testing. -- Bill Ricker [email protected] https://www.linkedin.com/in/n1vux