Re: [Boston.pm] test::something that captures/hide expected stderr
David Cantrell <[email protected]> Tue, 8 Mar 2022 23:55:53 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.perl-mongers.boston |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 08/03/2022 22:17, Bill Ricker via Boston-pm wrote: > On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 2:16 PM David Cantrell <[email protected]> wrote: >> The best tool for this is Capture::Tiny. >> I won't disagree with David. > Capture and then test the caught value with an is() or like() is quite > straight forward, so I still won't disagree with David. > ... > However OTOH, the testing community would likely recommend considering as > the idiomatic and declarative testing way either > > *Test::Most* & *Test::Exception* 's syntactic sugar *throws_ok() * > > throws_ok {block under test} qr/regex/, q(explanation); I do both, and whichever one I use depends on the circumstances. > or the post-modern *Test2::Tools::Exception* 's *dies*() > > like( > dies { die 'xxx' }, > qr/xxx/, > "Got exception" > ); There's nothing post-modern about Test2! I don't think I'd want to use a post-modern testing tool which said "that's not really a failure, it's all subjective, and what is truth anyway" :-) Using Test2's `dies` like this is fine, but where Test2 really comes into its own IMO is in its improved tools for mocking. -- David Cantrell