Re: *more* relocatable perl
Gianni Ceccarelli via perl5-porters <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:24:39 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.perl5.porters |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260721112439.69c439fa@exelion> |
On Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:06:13 +0200 (CEST) "Smylers" via perl5-porters <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes. It makes sense. Thanks. > Is there a situation in which somebody wants the current relocatable > behaviour but would be disadvantaged by your proposed additional > relocatableness? I don't know / can't think of any, but I trust this list to come up with some =E2=98=BA --=20 Dakkar - <Mobilis in mobile> GPG public key fingerprint =3D A071 E618 DD2C 5901 9574 6FE2 40EA 9883 7519 3F88 key id =3D 0x75193F88