Re: Suggestions on which poe DBI module to use

Last night I remembered (at least partially) the one problem I had with 
EasyDBI.

I had some minor problems when connecting to the DB 
(http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=36693 and I think something 
else that I can't find documented).  I worked around it with an eval { 
...  }; if ($@) {... }

-Andrew

Andrew Feren wrote:
> It's been a while since I looked at all of these.  I have some code 
> using EasyDBI and other code using SimpleDBI.
>
> Initially EasyDBI was the only one I could get to work on both Linux 
> and Windows.  As of version 1.27 SimpleDBI also works on both 
> platforms.  EasyDBI seems to offer a few more specialized ways to get 
> data back ('single' for example), but you can get the same info with 
> either module.  My very limited benchmarking of the two modules 
> yielded comparable results.
> I haven't looked at LaDBI or DBIAgent in a long while so I can't 
> really comment other than to say that when I looked at them they 
> wouldn't run on Windows.
>
> -Andrew
>
> Josh803316 wrote:
>> I've read the cpan module docs and have looked at the cookbook example (
>> http://poe.perl.org/?POE_Cookbook/DBI_Helper_Processes). The following
>> modules all run non-blocking async dbi calls for poe but I'm not sure 
>> which
>> I should choose.  I would love to see a pro/con list for these or get 
>> some
>> sort of guidance on which would work better in my network testing app.
>>
>> I'm sure everyone has favourites out there, but is there any reason 
>> to use
>> one over another in certain scenarios?  Are there any drawbacks or 
>> things to
>> watch out for on specific modules?
>>
>> POE::Component::LaDBI
>>
>> POE::Component::EasyDBI
>>
>> POE::Component::DBIAgent
>>
>> POE::Component::SimpleDBI
>>
>>   
>