Re: POE::Component::Server::TCP bug fixes, possibly incompatible

On (07/15 18:59), Michael Fowler wrote:

> The code I have that actually needs it would benefit from the clarity of
> having the socket passed as ARG0.  Whether or not this breaks some
> possible future change in something...

Perhaps I'm misreading... What I'm hearing is "you should change this
for me, regardless of whether it breaks other people's code". Is that an
accurate summary?

--
sungo
http://sungo.us

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkpem+sACgkQ3wph+sE0MUvEswCeLspobRK+RGW6qKpXGVCRnLYH
oHkAn0RmOghS5xZCypYBPL6k7BZ6k1gs
=ojEv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----