Re: POE::Component::Server::TCP bug fixes, possibly incompatible
Olivier Mengué <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.poe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Euh, well, I was meaning option A. But either A or C is good for me. Option B is too awkward as a bad API would stay forever and would bite any new Server::TCP user. Le 21 juillet 2009 12:37, Olivier Mengué <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > 2009/7/16 Chris 'BinGOs' Williams <[email protected]> > >> Anyways, I see three options: >> >> a). Make the functionality match the documentation; >> >> b). Make the documentation match the functionality; >> >> c). Do what dngor suggests and flatten ClientArgs, forget the socket >> and document as such. >> >> Cheers, >> > > As a POE::Component::Server::TCP user (useful to quickly write tests for > client components), I prefer option C as I complained about 2 months ago : > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04260.html > > Olivier Mengué. >