Re: maint-5.10-1131-gdfc0ab6 on VMS status

Craig A. Berry wrote:
> 
> On May 10, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 08:52:54PM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
>>> Craig A. Berry wrote:
>>>> With a -Duseithreads build using HP C V7.3-018 on OpenVMS IA64
>>>> V8.3-1H1, I get:
>>>>
>>>> ext/Cwd/t/cwd.................................................FAILED at
>>>> test 23
>>>> lib/Archive/Extract/t/01_Archive-Extract......................FAILED at
>>>> test 74
>>>> lib/CPANPLUS/Dist/Build/t/02_CPANPLUS-Dist-Build..............FAILED at
>>>> test 11
>>>> lib/CPANPLUS/t/19_CPANPLUS-Dist...............................FAILED at
>>>> test 62
>>
>>>> lib/ExtUtils/t/basic..........................................FAILED--expected 
>>>>
>>>> 81 tests, saw 84
>>>> lib/Module/Build/t/compat.....................................FAILED at
>>>> test 22
>>>> lib/Module/Build/t/ext........................................FAILED at
>>>> test 142
>>>> Failed 7 tests out of 1560, 99.55% okay.
>>>>
>>>> This is identical to blead except for the Cwd test, which succeeds in
>>>> blead.
>>>>
>>>> The next step is digging around in all the relevant RT queues to see
>>>> what's already been fixed but not brought into the core yet.
>>>
>>> As of blead 2009-04-25.23.16:08, with the patches that I have previously
>>> submitted, I only have the two CPANPLUS tests failing.
>>
>> Are these previously-submitted patches yet to be applied to blead, and if
>> so, is that due to waiting on upstream maintainers?
> 
> I think there's a mix.  If there is more than a screenful of smoke, or 
> something I know about has been languishing in an RT queue a long time, 
> I may apply it to blead, but otherwise I wait for upstream.  I don't 
> know offhand which patches John is referring to or what queues they are 
> in.  I hope to find time to research that soon but can't make any promises.
> 
> I'm about to try a maint-5.10 build again and see where the PathTools 
> integration got us.

The basic.t and ext.t have been applied to CPAN but apparently have not 
made it into blead yet.

I am not sure about the compat.t issue, I do not show a different 
compat.t than blead.

I am not showing any differences in my code to the last time I synced 
with blead for Archive::Tar.

I have not been updating my local setup as I am trying to find out what 
is causing the access violation in SV.C first.  I do not know if I can 
find it before the Dayton Hamfest.

-John
[email protected]
Personal Opinion Only