Re: Perl Quiz of the Week #24 (Turing Machine simulation)

"Peter Haworth" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.perl.qotw.discuss
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:09:09 -0400, John Macdonald wrote:
> Other additions that would be useful (but not strictly
> necessary) would be:
> 
> - allow a wildcard or class match to the symbol being examined

This makes it harder to show that you have a finite list of symbols

> - have a "don't change the current symbol" as an alternative
>   to always specifying an explicit replacement symbol

Ditto

> - as well as l and r to move the position left and right,
>   permit 0 to stay in place

Then it stops being a Turing machine

-- 
	Peter Haworth	[email protected]
Nigel Hamilton: I'll have some of what [Richard Stallman]'s smoking.
Jonathan Peterson: Might be tricky. I'm pretty sure he's smoked all of it.
		That's the only possible explanation for the guy.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.