Re: [QUIZ] Perl 'Hard' Quiz of the Week #2005-03-22
Colin Rafferty <colin.rafferty-/PgpppG8B+R7qynMiXIxWgC/[email protected]> Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:54:32 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.qotw.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Greg Bacon wrote: > Shlomi Fish writes: >> sequence of binary digits (starting from the least significant bit) > Should "least significant" be "most significant," I missed that as well. Given that his example automata is written for "most significant", I assume that the word "least" was a typo, rather than his example. > It's interesting that the resulting automata are isomorphic to one > another. That they do makes sense after you've seen it, but it wasn't > an initial expectation. I don't see that at all. My solution for MSB-first was pretty straightforward. In fact, it was by far the shortest solution for a 'Hard' quiz ever. However, I would need an entirely different approach for a LSB-first problem. I guess that would qualify as a hard quiz. We can discuss this more in another 1 day 5 hours 37 seconds (as the third easy quiz tells me). -- Colin