Re: Dual life t/test.pl?

On 11/14/11 7:59 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Having a parallel and featureful testing system is very useful.  I use it to
> test Test::More (in the Test-Builder1.5 branch).  Others might find it useful
> to do the same.
>
> t/test.pl is very important to the Perl core tests, but it is largely
> undocumented and untested.

Regardless of what p5p decides to do, I'll take up your earlier 
suggestion of writing a separate .pod file to document t/test.pl and do 
this in a branch of TB2.

jimk