Re: Dual life t/test.pl?
"Jerry D. Hedden" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.perl5.porters,gmane.comp.lang.perl.quality-assurance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABcAEYy1BAenO2BoDpLvavbE+GK6U=8sbR5f3rsyi-d=d_V6wA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:34, Nicholas Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > This was suggested previously in 2008 > > http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-06/msg00912.html > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 04:59:57PM -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote: >> Having a parallel and featureful testing system is very useful. I use it to >> test Test::More (in the Test-Builder1.5 branch). Others might find it useful >> to do the same. > > Other than people writing test modules, who would find it useful? FWIW, threads and threads::shared use test.pl in their test suites. This seems to be historical and related to the fact that older versions of Test::More didn't work will with threads. However, changing to use Test::More may be undesirable because it means testing threads using a module that needs to support threads testing.