Re: Relying more on Mouse

Michael Ludwig <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.perl.quality-assurance
Message-ID <20111126193408.GM4556@Dago>
Gabor Szabo schrieb am 26.11.2011 um 10:44 (+0200):
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Ovid <[email protected]>
> wrote:

> > Rename TB2::Mouse to something like
> > TB2::_U_R_A_MORON_FOR_USING_THIS_ and I
> > think the problem will take care of itself.

> I can just imagine what people outside of the Perl community
> will say when they see such code in the official distribution
> of Perl.

Which is why TB2::Mole or TB2::Vole are better solutions.

I don't understand the concern for unauthorised use. How would
it be different from relying on any other implementation detail?
In spirit, it's like relying on internal JDK classes.

TB2::Mouse/Hamster/Mole/Vole does not mean Mouse is core.

Just my two end user cents.
-- 
Michael Ludwig
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.