Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects?

On 12-04-10 05:59 PM, Leon Timmermans wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Mike Doherty <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I don't see any discouragement in the documentation... and what's wrong
>> with use_ok to begin with?
> 
> If it fails, the module may not be loaded, or partially loaded. In
> such circumstances, testing the rest of the code can give very
> confusing results. It doesn't make sense to continue testing usually.

I typically use_ok(...) or BAIL_OUT. If that's the only way to use
use_ok safely, then maybe it should do that for you automatically.

-Mike