Re: Revert use_ok() change to allow lexical effects?

Andy Lester <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.perl.quality-assurance
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On Apr 11, 2012, at 5:48 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:

> The stop energy
> he is throwing at it has no substantive reason so far, only “I don’t
> care for this”.

No, no, no, I'm sorry, I didn't mean to make it sound like "You shouldn't do this module."  No stop energy intended. I just wanted to provide a counter viewpoint from a potential customer.

I don't want to have another module prereq.  I'd probably just do the cut & paste into my t/00-load.t. 

Carry on!

xoa

--
Andy Lester => [email protected] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.