Re: Proposal Test::TAPv13
Ovid <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.quality-assurance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>________________________________ > From: Michael G Schwern <[email protected]> >I think we don't have to guess at that. Structured diagnostics are only >associated with test results (and possibly start/end of test info). They're >not used like diag() is now as both a warning mechanism and a test result >information system. Just a minor comment: yes, we also would want structured diagnostics at the start and end of each test (and subtest). There are numerous reasons. Anyone who uses Test::Class extensively would be comfortable with this when they thing about startup/setup/teardown/shutdown test control methods. Cheers, Ovid -- Live and work overseas - http://www.overseas-exile.com/ Buy the book - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/ Tech blog - http://blogs.perl.org/users/ovid/ Twitter - http://twitter.com/OvidPerl/