Re: [PATCH] for review: docs for the undocumented --rules option for'prove' (and related TAP::* bits)

# from Mark Stosberg on Thursday 30 August 2012:
>I suspect there's a bug that works as follows, but I haven't isolated
>it yet. Here's my suspected trigger:
>
>- First start some tests that are parallel ready, but some of them are
>slow. - Next in the schedule have some tests which much be run in
>sequence.
>
>I think the "sequence" tests are in fact being run in sequence, but
>some of the "slow" parallel tests are still running.

Is that a bug?  I thought sequenced tests were only excluded from 
running in parallel with each other -- and that parallel tests were 
compatible running alongside all others.

--Eric
-- 
---------------------------------------------------
    http://scratchcomputing.com
---------------------------------------------------