Re: Anyone want Test::Class::Moose?

Ovid <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.perl.quality-assurance
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Justin,

This is something I've wondered as well. Several times when people asked me about using Test::Class with Moose I pointed them to Test::Able, though I confess I never used that code. Invariably they would not choose it. I think what's going on is the interface. It looks "different" and that's possibly scaring people off. The interface for Test::Class::Moose looks very similar to Test::Class and that might make for easier adoption if I ever do enough to get it out of alpha.

Please note that I'm not saying that what I've written is better! However, the comfort level of the Test::Class::Moose interface may be appealing to some.
 
Cheers,
Ovid
--
Twitter - http://twitter.com/OvidPerl/
Buy my book - http://bit.ly/beginning_perl
Buy my other book - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/
Live and work overseas - http://www.overseas-exile.com/


>________________________________
> From: Justin DeVuyst <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected] 
>Sent: Friday, 14 December 2012, 19:54
>Subject: Re: Anyone want Test::Class::Moose?
> 
>All,
>
>What's wrong with Test::Able?
>
>-jdv
>
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.