Re: BBC testing from upriver downwards

On 04/04/2017 05:37 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 5 April 2017 at 08:28, James E Keenan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> the tip of the order of battle looks substantially different
>
>
> I must say though, your results confuse me.
>
> In my testing, the things that are holding back the most are ...
> Module::Runtime , and Task::Weaken.
>
> But neither of those are even *ON* your list.
>

They wouldn't be on my list if they were successfully installed.

Module::Runtime was successfully installed all three times -- though 
that's actually two times, because my first run used an earlier perl 5 
blead commit.  Each of the three runs used a different, progressively 
newer version of 'cpanm'.

Task::Weaken did not succeed on my first run (20170330).  It failed here:

#####
Can't locate inc/Module/Install.pm in @INC (you may need to install the 
inc::Module::Install module) (@INC contains: 
/home/jkeenan/testing/blead/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.25.11/x86_64-linux 
/home/jkeenan/testing/blead/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.25.11 
/home/jkeenan/testing/blead/lib/perl5/5.25.11/x86_64-linux 
/home/jkeenan/testing/blead/lib/perl5/5.25.11) at Makefile.PL line 42.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at Makefile.PL line 42.
-> N/A
-> FAIL Configure failed for Task-Weaken-1.04. See 
/home/jkeenan/.cpanm/work/1490881305.4413/build.log for details.
#####

However, Task::Weaken succeeded on the second run -- where I was working 
with a more recent blead and with App-cpanminus v1.7042 -- and was 
therefore already installed in time for the third run.

So, the only thing I can offer is:  Are you working with (a) a recent 
enough blead to capture all the changes relevant to no-dot; and (b) the 
very most recent version of cpanm?

Thank you very much.
Jim Keenan