Re: Releasing widget collections
Rob Seegel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.tk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Steve Lidie wrote: > I vote for CPAN as the master repository - that's where all other Tk > widgets are located. As for bundling, I'm torn here. Generally *I* > do not like having to install a bundle to get at a single widget. > Then again, it makes your life easier ;) I can sympathize with having to download everything to get just one widget, but it sure makes it easier for me to manage! ;) How about the following case: I noticed that some of my composites shared some code, so I created a base class, and had each of the composites inherit the common methods/options. By itself, the base class has very limited value, however the other composites need it to function correctly. Maybe it would be better to get a namespace off of Tk? Tk::RSWidget or something, provided that Nick approved it that I could use as a separate directory that would contain the additional widgets. There's about a half a dozen or so widgets that would go under this directory. My new version of JComboBox is one of the ones that extends the base class. Rob -++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**== This message was posted through the Stanford campus mailing list server. If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message body of "unsubscribe ptk" to [email protected]