Re: question about Ptk new version
Nick Ing-Simmons <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.tk |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Vadim Konovalov <[email protected]> writes: > >again, all 8.5 things, with *all* Tcl/Tk widgets, are readily available >for Perl with a help of Tcl::Tk, and Tkx, CPAN modules. Of course they are - and as you keep pointing that out I am sure ALL the readers of the perl/Tk list know that. But they persist in reading a list DEDICATED to the perl/Tk way, and I still try and support them as time permits, as do other regular posters here. If Tcl::Tk is so much better why are you still reading this list? > >Complexity of Perl/Tk isn't an advantage. _I_ find OO style of perl/Tk an advantage - which is why I wrote it that way. If _I_ was going to change toolkits I would probably move to Gtk rather than Tcl::Tk -++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**== This message was posted through the Stanford campus mailing list server. If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message body of "unsubscribe ptk" to [email protected]