RE: question about Ptk new version

> >> _I_ find OO style of perl/Tk an advantage - which is why I 
> >> wrote it that 
> >> way. 
> >
> >Tcl::Tk uses sane OO syntax, BTW
> >
> 
> Syntax isn't OO.

okay, you invented nice syntax and borrowed OO from Tix.

Tcl/Tk has many OO systems, which I do not enlist here.

I have no wish to buy perl/Tk OO for that a large price, and of course
other's wish may differ (unlike Python, Ruby, wsWidgets, etc, people)


> 
> See for example recent thread here about deriving a class from 
> an existing one. (Subject: Fwd: (fwd) binding to a derived canvas widget).

yes, I saw that.

Vadim.


-++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==
This message was posted through the Stanford campus mailing list
server.  If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the
message body of "unsubscribe ptk" to [email protected]