Re: Future of Perl/Tk?

"Konovalov, Vadim Vladimirovich (Vadim)** CTR **" <[email protected]> writes:

> > As much as I hate to ask, but has there been any discussion 
> > on what will 
> > happen with Perl/Tk now? It has been a long time since there 
> > was a new 
> > release, and there are quite a few bug reports in rt, and the various 
> > Perl forums. Perhaps the source could be moved to sourceforge or a 
> > similar repository to encourage community involvement.
> 
> I very agree with moving to central repository, with several committers.
> Mailed patches to one person tend to lose.
> 
> Unfortunately "perltk" is created on SF by Bill Atkins, who is not responsible right now.
> 

Hmm, I cannot find a "perltk" project on SF. Shouldn't such a project
live under http://sourceforge.net/projects/perltk ?

> 
> 
> > 
> > Meanwhile, and probably by no coincidence, there has been an 
> > explosion 
> > of growth with the various alternatives including not one, but two 
> > possible ways of bridging to Tcl/Tk, which seem to produce decent 
> 
> IMO bridging to Tcl/Tk is the best, and perl/Tk will win with including Tcl interpreter.
> 
> Anyway central repository for perl/Tk is a must.
> 

I started a (half-)private subversion repository on Perl/Tk some days
ago: https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/srezic/Tk
It contains the source code of Tk 804.027 with a couple of patches
found on rt or elsewhere in the net. I am willing to move the
repository to a more public place.

Regards,
        Slaven

-- 
Slaven Rezic - slaven <at> rezic <dot> de

    tksm - Perl/Tk program for searching and replacing in multiple files
    http://ptktools.sourceforge.net/#tksm
--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==
ptk mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/ptk