RE: Future of Perl/Tk?

--- [email protected] wrote:

>  I'm *still* more
> interested in fixing Perl/Tk, 


I hope you guys can keep perl/Tk going.  If not
perl/Tk, then I hope something else that is "built
into" perl can be accomplished, not the bridge.   I
could give a list of reasons why, but I really don't
have the technical merits to debate this.   I just
think perl needs a full-featured GUI library of it's
own and I wanted to let you guys know that there are
intermediate/hobby programmers like myself that have
really benefitted from perl/Tk - at my work (a
pharmacy), we rely heavily on the perl/Tk programs I
have written.   

Thanks,
Bryan




 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Cheap Talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates 
(http://voice.yahoo.com)

--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==--++**==
ptk mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/ptk