Re: Perl XML::Parser failing tests
mirod <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.xml |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tyler Riddle wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I did some research and benchmarks on processing large XML documents - > specifically I benchmarked all the SAX parsers I could find, > XML::Twig, XML::Records, XML::Rules, and two C based parsers across 5 > different languages of the Wikipedia. You can find a graph of the > results here: http://triddle.us/XML_parser_benchmark.png > > X is the XML parser name (expat.t and libxml.t are the C based SAX interfaces) > Y is the speed in mebibytes > Z is the language of the Wikipedia > > The cv file is about 50 megs and the en file is about 22 gigs; the > other files are somewhere in between. Cute graphic, even though personally I prefer this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PicassoGuernica.jpg Without more information, both are approximately as relevant to the discussion at hand. Would you care to share the code you used so it can be analyzed the results can be reproduced? -- mirod _______________________________________________ Perl-XML mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs