Re: XML::Saxon::XSLT2

By all means, if you get your stuff done using LibXSLT that's totally fine.
I am not so much into saxon, xslt etc. and performance measuring  to tell
you where one processor beats the other one.

I never really bothered to learn XSLT 1.0 properly and always found it very
comfortable, logical and easy to use XSLT2.0. Up to now there was neither a
 nice way to use saxon from perl, nor XSLT2.0 form perl. That's why I am so
excited to that XML::Saxon:XSLT2 offers both now.

I was already learning Java just to simplify things... will stick with perl
for the moment and defer Java to the next challenge.



On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Thomas Krichel <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>  Maurice Mengel writes
>
> > So far for now.
>
>  Whatever module you use, it's not likely to be faster than the
>  underlying processor, is it? Thus, if you are like me, and you
>  have a working XSLT implementation using XML::LibXSLT, is there
>  a reason to switch to a saxon-based module? A quick search
>  reveals
>
> http://www.davidpashley.com/articles/xslt-benchmarks.html
>
>  which claim that LibXSLT beats saxon hands-down. But it's
>  from 2006.
>
>
>  Cheers,
>
>  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>                                http://authorclaim.org/profile/pkr1
>                                               skype: thomaskrichel
>

_______________________________________________
Perl-XML mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs