Re: "XML::SAX should not distribute XML::SAX::Base package"
Grant McLean <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:00:43 +1300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.xml |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1300093243.3729.29.camel@hoiho> |
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 21:43 +0100, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > I am trying to clean up some of my CPAN RT bugs and ran across this > one https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=57235 which also refers > to <https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=57238>. Would anyone > have any thoughts on this? As the person currently (doing a terrible job of) maintaining the XML-SAX distribution, I guess I should have an opinion. I was only recently made aware of the problem and have exchanged emails with Kip but we haven't yet settled on a firm plan. It definitely looks like XML-SAX-Base should be distributed as a separate distribution and XML-SAX should list XML-SAX-Base as a dependency (at least for the regression test suite). I'm not sure why XML-SAX-Base was included as a subdirectory in the CVS for XML-SAX but it's been that way since before I inherited XML-SAX. The version of XML-SAX-Base that's distributed with XML-SAX seems to have had a few patches added to it since the last version released by Kip. So the simplest solution is probably for me upload two new tarballs containing the same files as were in the last XML-SAX release but split into separate distributions. Then if Kip wants to do any further changes to XML-SAX-Base he can simply upload a new release of XML-SAX-Base (the 'Unauthorized Upload' label on his upload is just a glitch in the matrix - he does have the required permissions). There are other outstanding patches for XML-SAX but it's probably cleaner to apply them in a subsequent release. Cheers Grant _______________________________________________ Perl-XML mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs