Re: What would you like to see in XML::LibXML ?
Francisco Obispo <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Dec 2012 11:04:06 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.xml |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'm just thinking that it would be interesting to have the parser look at the xmlns and see if there is a matching entry in the XML catalog, and if there is, it should use that for validation. If that's not the case, we should then make really explicit that the ->validation(1) option is just really dtd_validation. Perhaps we could then add ->xsd_validation(1) and ->rng_validation(1) ? What I want to avoid is to have the parse-validation de-coupled. Francisco Obispo Director of Applications and Services - ISC email: [email protected] Phone: +1 650 423 1374 || INOC-DBA *3557* NOC PGP KeyID = B38DB1BE On Dec 3, 2012, at 1:27 AM, Shlomi Fish <[email protected]> wrote: > > Not sure I like it. For once, there are other types of schemas - RELAX NG, > Schematron, etc. And furthermore, it may be quite costly, and I'm not sure if > the libxml2 interface maps directly to it. > > Regards, > > Shlomi Fish _______________________________________________ Perl-XML mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs