Re: Doubt about compiler error of `has_value` with arrays

Hmm.  I=E2=80=99m not sure where I fall on this. I can appreciate that the h=
aystack may have a type and you might want to restrict the type over the ope=
rand in some situations but it seems like a method like has_value should be l=
enient with respect to the value being searched for.=20


Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 13, 2025, at 1:13=E2=80=AFPM, Chris Angelico <[email protected]> wro=
te:
>=20
> =EF=BB=BFOn Fri, 14 Mar 2025 at 03:31, Marcos Cruz <[email protected]=
et> wrote:
>> So somehow the problem happens when the array argument is a literal,
>> both in hilfe and in a file.
>=20
> When you use literals, yes, has_value expects that the argument makes
> sense. But normally you'll be using a variable for one or both of its
> arguments, so the expectation of the function will match your mental
> expectation and it should be more reasonable.
>=20
> ChrisA
>=20