Re: Availability of Pike SRPMs for EL8 and newer builds
Maksim AbuAjamieh <[email protected]> Sun, 7 Dec 2025 02:00:14 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.pike.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--Apple-Mail-3E156250-3ACF-4646-82EC-5D2A824820D8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3D= utf-8"></head><body dir=3D"auto"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">=EF=BB=BF= <div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div>Hi Bill,</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks so much f= or the update and for taking the time to clean things up and make them acces= sible. </div><div><br></div><div>I=E2=80=99ll look forward to the SRPMs= whenever you=E2=80=99re ready to share them, but it is perfectly fine if yo= u would prefer to just share what you already have. I really appreciate the e= ffort you are putting into this.</div><div><br></div>Best regards,<br></div>= Maksim</div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir=3D= "ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 7:41=E2=80=AFAM <<a hr= ef=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>> wrote:<br></= div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;bord= er-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi-<br> <br> That would be my fault... I've always been so focused on the rpms but <br> the srpm is an artifact I seem to forget to upload the SRPM.<br> <br> I have a spec file that's never been checked into version control, as <br> well as some scripts that I've used to produce the RPMs available for <br> download... Part of the reason it's always languished on my build system <br= > is that the spec file needs changing for various el releases, and <br> there's a separate dependency installation step required to get the <br> builds to work. I didn't want a proliferation of files in the pike <br> packaging directory. I will try to clean those up a bit and put them <br> somewhere publicly accessible.<br> <br> Note: pike doesn't seem to build properly on el10, I suspect due to the <br>= version of gcc in use. The fix is a one-liner, but a patch is necessary <br>= until a new release is made.<br> <br> Stand by for an update on this, probably in a day or two.<br> <br> Best,<br> <br> Bill<br> <br> <br> On 2025-11-18 12:25, Maksim AbuAjamieh wrote:<br> > Hello,<br> > <br> > While looking through the EL8 packages at:<br> > <br> > <a href=3D"https://pike.lysator.liu.se/download/pub/pike/all/8.0.1738/e= l8/" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://pike.lysator.liu.se/downlo= ad/pub/pike/all/8.0.1738/el8/</a><br> > <br> > I noticed that the repository provides the binary RPMs but not the<br> > corresponding source RPMs. Is there a particular reason the SRPMs<br> > aren=E2=80=99t published for this build?<br> > <br> > If the SRPMs are available elsewhere, I=E2=80=99d appreciate a pointer.= <br> > I=E2=80=99m also interested in building more recent Pike versions for n= ewer<br> > RHEL derivatives and potentially Fedora, so if there are newer RPMs<br>= > (with matching source packages) available, please let me know where<br>= > they can be found.<br> > <br> > Thanks in advance for any guidance.<br> </blockquote></div> </div></div></body></html>= --Apple-Mail-3E156250-3ACF-4646-82EC-5D2A824820D8--