`== and nan - docs accuracy?

"Per Hedbor () @ Pike (-) importm?te f?r mailinglistan" <[email protected]> Fri, 23 May 2014 10:35:01 +0000 (UCT)

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.lang.pike.user
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

> This is correct behaviour per IEEE (NaN is not equal to anything,
> including itself), but the docs say that == returns true "iff the
> two floats are numerically equal or if both are NaN". Is this a docs
> bug, or is there something else going on here?

Well. Considering these testsuite testcases:

test_false( Math.nan == Math.nan )
test_true( Math.nan != Math.nan )

I would consider it to be a documatation issue.

-- 
Per Hedbor