Re: Unit testing
Martin Bähr <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.pike.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Excerpts from Sup Auto-generated Fake Sender's message of 2014-10-18 12:00:02 +0200: > And a good question on the naming convention. > > At the moment you can name your test methods with an underscore like test_foo > becaue angler looks for test* duh, why didn't i think of that? so i can have my cake even if you don't change anything. never mind then, i'll leave it up to you. > However many communities seems out of convetion use test_*, like > So the question is, should the framework force test_* or should it be convention? if in doubt, do what everyone else does. and as it happens, if you keep things as they are, that's exactly what we get. i look forward to an opportunity to use this... greetings, martin. -- eKita - the online platform for your entire academic life -- chief engineer eKita.co pike programmer pike.lysator.liu.se caudium.net societyserver.org BLUG secretary beijinglug.org foresight developer foresightlinux.org realss.com unix sysadmin Martin Bähr working in china http://societyserver.org/mbaehr/