Re: Stdio.Buffer, need a way to revisit old positions in the output

> Since you would need to call three functions to do the same thing as
> the subbuffer call (get offset, get added size, update at first
> offset) the time offsets are 0.12 vs 0.20 s per 1M calls on my
> machine.

By the way, you can already do this:

int i = sizeof(buffer);
buffer->add_padding(4);
...
int l = sizeof(buffer)-i;
buffer[i] = l>>24;
buffer[i+1] = l>>16;
buffer[i+2] = l>>8;
buffer[i+3] = l>>8;

-- 
Per Hedbor