Re: final protected private symbol
Martin Bähr <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.pike.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Excerpts from Stephen R. van den Berg's message of 2014-11-12 03:24:01 +0100: > Can anyone point me to the docs (or answer it here) where it > is explained what the exact implications are of the modifiers > final, protected and private? apart from the tutorial there are moree wordy explanations for each keyword in the pike book. (btw: bill, how about releasing the book online now for free?) > And, what happens if they are combined; do all permutations make sense? probably the best answer on the last question: from Martin Stjernholm: Just a note: There's no reason to use both private and protected at the same time. private is strictly more restrictive, so it implies protected. https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01710.html greetings, martin. -- eKita - the online platform for your entire academic life -- chief engineer eKita.co pike programmer pike.lysator.liu.se caudium.net societyserver.org BLUG secretary beijinglug.org foresight developer foresightlinux.org realss.com unix sysadmin Martin Bähr working in china http://societyserver.org/mbaehr/