Re: Weird parsing error in Pike 8.1

Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
>Chris Angelico wrote:
>>22dbe6 - there was a typo in an apparently-unrelated piece of code,

>>in its own compilation error. But with that fixed, reverting c7de86
>>doesn't reinstate the behaviour you referred to. Is that any sort of
>>clue? It doesn't say anything to my mind.

With regards to apparently-unrelated and clue, yes, this is a clue, but
it points (AFAICS) towards some obscure stuff which is either
not right in the perceived declaration of the Stdio.Buffer.read_int32
member, or a parser in Pike running on steroids mixing up ints and
voids under the right stellar constellations.
-- 
Stephen.