Re: Re: Re: Optional args in C code.

Michael Geary wrote:

> Mark, this reminds me that I've been meaning to ask: Why did you
> choose C instead of C++? I know I would have been sorely tempted to
> use C++ for its convenience and the way it can help you write
> reliable code more easily (destructors, etc.).

Would the fact that I hate C++ with a purple passion be reason enough? :-)