Re: Re: Optional args in C code.

Joe Knapka wrote:

> If I tell GCC to conform to ISO C99 (which is "not fully supported" in
> GCC 3.2, according to "man gcc"; so maybe this behavior is erroneous),
> I get both C++ // comments and anywhere-decls. I can see no option to
> Visual Studio .NET that makes it support C99 (I'm looking at the M$
> Library docs for CL).

I have googled for "embedded declarations" and can only find them in
reference to C++.  I can't find any mention of them in connection to C,
either GNU or Microsoft.

Unless something new comes up, let stick with the "defacto ansii" which is
the real ansii plus //, typedef, etc.  This defacto language seems to be a
standard across the open-source world.

Of course the actual definition is whatever my Visual Studio supports and I
have a feeling it will be frozen at whatever it is forever since Billy Gates
cares not a whit about C anymore.

If the Psycho technique really works, we may be writing everything in
Prothon at some point soon anyway.  Wouldn't that be awesome.