Re: class proposal 2

Greg Ewing wrote:

> This looks interesting, but something doesn't seem quite right about
> it. If class methods are to be methods of the class in the same way
> that instance methods are methods of the instance, they should be kept
> in the instance-method-area of the class's class, not in the class.
>
> Classes in this proposal don't seem to have classes. In other words,
> they're not themselves objects within their own paradigm.  In this
> respect, they're more like old-style Python classes.  To a Python
> person, this will seem like a backward step.

I knew someone would ask for metaclasses. :-)

I"ll see if I can fix my proposal to add this property.  Feel free to help
me out here.