Re: class proposal 2
"Mark Hahn" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.prothon.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Greg Ewing wrote: > Classes in this proposal don't seem to have classes. In other words, > they're not themselves objects within their own paradigm. Would having them be objects in the prototype paradigm be good enough? We need to think through some usage cases. I think one of the advantages of this class proposal is it's simplicity and how it ties in with the simple prototypes. I'd love to keep that simplicity.