Re: Re: This is kind of cool

Paul Prescod wrote:

>>     def ~%~(x, y):
>>         blah blah blah
>
> I can't find anything to indicate that Ruby lets you define your own
> new operators.

I guess I remembered wrong.  I do know it let's you define the operators by
just typing the symbols instead of names like add_.

It would be easy to let you define new ones.  I doubt that would make sense
though.  Just what we need is a lot of random unreadable symbols :-)

Which gets us back to your idea which is readable since a label is between
the tildes.