Re: Re[2]: Re: class proposal

Lenard Lindstrom wrote:

>  Prothon
> is supposedly "classless". That is why the name "Prototype Python".
> But now the discussion
> is on to add classes to Prothon. Yet the prothon interpreter lacks
> that low level abstract "type" layer of C-Python. Lacking this layer
> the prothon interpreter will understand classes directly. That is,
> the prothon interpreter will know two object types, prototypes and
> classes,
> and treat each differently. Except for certain optimizations the
> Python interpreter only
> understands one kind of object. It knows how to find the PyTypeObject
> of an object, and
> it knows how to call methods of PyTypeObject. So at the root of it
> the Python language under C-Python is more classless than Prothon
> will be.

You are jumping the gun a little bit.  We have not decided how to implement
classes yet.