Re: Acronym for Prothon PEPs
Laurent Dube <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.prothon.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | DEI |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mark Hahn wrote: > We'll > just do one page per PREP with a simple index page with hyperlinks. > > The biggest problem will be that I come with with multiple proposals per > day. Will they be modifications to PREPs or new PREPs? It's better "we" think ahead, in order to keep simple the "we'll just do" part... What prompted this discussion is Paul's remark: > Pretty soon we'll need PEPs to keep track of all of this stuff. about needing to keep track of our discussions and the related ideas that are thrown in. This need for collaborative idea gathering gave me an idea, which I'm developing in the next thread: Prothon Lang Dev Wiki As for PEPs, I'm not sure we need formal "enhancement proposals" just yet. For these, the acronym PREP can be retained to be used when we do. I would also be inclined to put PREPs in a wiki format, when we come to it. But let's deal with our current discussions first. Laurent Dube