Re: print ambiguity

Paul Prescod wrote:

>> 2) If we decide it always means a variable we would have to type
>> "print()" to print a blank line and the console could be used as
>> always.
>
> print ""
>
> would also work.
>
>> ...
>> This solution will mean that a variable on a line by itself in a
>> script, which used to be a harmless non-operation, will now cause an
>> exception saying that the variable is not a valid command.
>
> That's probably won't hurt anything.
>
> Either 2 or 3 is fine with me.

3 is implemented in 664.