Re: stackless language features

Mark Hahn wrote:

 > Lenard Lindstrom wrote:
 > ...
 > > In this case thread just replaces the gen keyword.
 >
 > Cool idea.  You've accomplished what you said you wanted to do about merging
 > gen and threads.  I will give some thought to see if there is any problem
 > with such a simple idea.

I like this. Do you remember my late-night take on simulation two weeks ago,
when I was making a case for

 > One object, one thread. Autonomous objects, you could say.

   Laurent Dube