Re: Re: On properties, use object instead?

On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 11:22:01 -0700 Mark Hahn <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> "Mukhsein Johari" <[email protected]> wrote
> 
> > I'm not sure if objects have set_, get_ methods but if
> > they did, we would not need prop keyword to implement
> > properties.
> >
> > Simply (using the example in the tutorial wiki):
> >
> > O>> object Widget:
> > ...    price = 76
> > ...    tax   = 2.12
> > ...
> > 2.12
> > O>> w = Widget()
> > <Object:c08db8>
> > O>> w.tax
> > 2.12
> > O>> with Widget:
> > ...    object tax:        # change tax to a 'property'
> > ...       def get_():     # define get_ method
> > ...          return self.price * 0.03
> 
> OOPS!  You would have to say...
> 
>     object tax(Property):    # change tax to a 'property'
>         def get_():     # define get_ method
>              return self.price * 0.03
> 
> Otherwise what Lenard warned about would happen.
> 
That does not work either. It is object Prop.

Lenard Lindstrom
<[email protected]>