Re: message from Parrot PieThon developer
"Mark Hahn" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.prothon.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>> Leopold Toetsch wrote: >>>> Anyway. You might have a look at Parrot, which could take some >>>> burden of the job "implementing a new interpreter". Parrot >>>> provides (or will soon provide) all the boring low-level stuff, >>>> like GC, Unicode strings, threads, events, async IO, JIT run core, >>>> real classes, and a lot more. Mark Hahn wrote: > What is the status of the library? That would make a giant difference > as Prothon has no library so far. Same as Prothon - currently[1] ;) *But* with the first of [perl5, perl6, python, ... ] running, things will change rapidly. You know CPAN has some useful code. Each interpreter's currently implementing the same things, over and over. That's a huge waste of creative man power, albeit sometimes instructive. Parrot is very special - an interpreter with no language running above it - or almost none, yet. But that's one desing goal -keep language features out of it, make it a generally useful interpreter for *all* :) leo [1] there is runtime/parrot/library and ./include with some useful stuff, i.e. bindings for ncurses and SDL or PCRE, but not too much yet. People are working on database interfaces ...