Re: message from Parrot PieThon developer

"Mark Hahn" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.prothon.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>>> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>>> Anyway. You might have a look at Parrot, which could take some
>>>> burden of the job "implementing a new interpreter". Parrot
>>>> provides (or will soon provide) all the boring low-level stuff,
>>>> like GC, Unicode strings, threads, events, async IO, JIT run core,
>>>> real classes, and a lot more.

Mark Hahn wrote:
> What is the status of the library? That would make a giant difference
> as Prothon has no library so far.

Same as Prothon - currently[1] ;) *But* with the first of [perl5, perl6,
python, ... ] running, things will change rapidly. You know CPAN has
some useful code. Each interpreter's currently implementing the same
things, over and over. That's a huge waste of creative man power, albeit
sometimes instructive.
Parrot is very special - an interpreter with no language running above
it - or almost none, yet. But that's one desing goal -keep language
features out of it, make it a generally useful interpreter for *all* :)
leo
[1] there is runtime/parrot/library and ./include with some useful
stuff, i.e. bindings for ncurses and SDL or PCRE, but not too much yet.
People are working on database interfaces ...
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.