RE: Re: stackless implementation (was Re: New stacklessproposal)
"Mark Hahn" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.prothon.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000301c46901$c5fccf60$0b01a8c0@mark> |
> From: Christian Tismer > Actually there are four, and I have to adjust the ranking: > > Pure OS: High memory. Low speed. C extensions OK. No pickling. > > Mixed: Medium memory. Medium speed. C extensions OK. > No pickling. > > Pure interp.: Low memory. High speed. No C extensions. Pickling OK. > > Stack pooled: Low memory. Higher speed. Either C extensions > or pickling. If "stack pooled" can do everything and is fasted and smallest why offer anything else? Is there no disadvantage at all? Can I trust you enough to say that we will only offer one type of super-thread that does it all. :-) Can I add pre-emption and sleep() without harming the normal operation of your threads?