RE: Re: stackless implementation (was Re: New stacklessproposal)

"Mark Hahn" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.prothon.user
Message-ID <000301c46901$c5fccf60$0b01a8c0@mark>
> From: Christian Tismer 

> Actually there are four, and I have to adjust the ranking:
> 
> Pure OS:      High memory. Low speed. C extensions OK. No pickling.
> 
> Mixed:        Medium memory. Medium speed. C extensions OK. 
> No pickling.
> 
> Pure interp.: Low memory. High speed. No C extensions. Pickling OK.
> 
> Stack pooled: Low memory. Higher speed. Either C extensions 
> or pickling.

If "stack pooled" can do everything and is fasted and smallest why offer
anything else?  Is there no disadvantage at all?

Can I trust you enough to say that we will only offer one type of
super-thread that does it all. :-)

Can I add pre-emption and sleep() without harming the normal operation
of your threads?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.