Re: Re: stackless implementation (was Re: New stacklessproposal)
Christian Tismer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.prothon.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mark Hahn wrote: ... > Oh, normal marketing, all lies. :-) Hee hee :) > Oh well, I should have known it was too good to be true. I'll hold off > on the pooled stacks unless/until you come back with some amazing > performance. Your are competing with the OS with this new feature. Sure. I know how slowly OS threads do their switching. Well, I never tried fibers from Windows, they might compare. > Right now I think the tasklets with C stack copying for one type of > thread combined with OS threads is a good overall conservative > combination. If I understand you correctly I can implement this with > your basic assembler primitives and by asking lots of questions. :-) Wait! If you reduce it to this, then there is no benefit remaining from your being stackless, but maybe the pickling. :-) ciao - chris -- Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:[email protected]> Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/ 14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ work +49 30 89 09 53 34 home +49 30 802 86 56 mobile +49 173 24 18 776 PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04 whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/