Re: stackless implementation (was Re: New stacklessproposal)
Christian Tismer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.prothon.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mark Hahn wrote: >>From: Christian Tismer > > >>>Right now I think the tasklets with C stack copying for one type of >>>thread combined with OS threads is a good overall conservative >>>combination. If I understand you correctly I can implement >> >>this with >> >>>your basic assembler primitives and by asking lots of questions. :-) >> >>Wait! >>If you reduce it to this, then there is no benefit remaining >>from your being stackless, but maybe the pickling. :-) > > > I don't understand. If they don't call C extensions then they will have > pure interpreter tasklets with maximum speed and minimum memory, all the > benefits of taskless, right? Yes, if you support it actively. What you were saying above sounded like just the Stackless 2.0 feature, stack moving only. Stackless 2.0 can be implemented for any interpreter as a pure extension module. -- Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:[email protected]> Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/ 14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/ work +49 30 89 09 53 34 home +49 30 802 86 56 mobile +49 173 24 18 776 PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04 whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/