Re: stackless implementation (was Re: New stacklessproposal)

"Mark Hahn" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.prothon.user
Message-ID <000401c4691d$747f14b0$0b01a8c0@mark>
> From: Christian Tismer

> > Right now I think the tasklets with C stack copying for one type of 
> > thread combined with OS threads is a good overall conservative 
> > combination.  If I understand you correctly I can implement 
> this with 
> > your basic assembler primitives and by asking lots of questions. :-)
> 
> Wait!
> If you reduce it to this, then there is no benefit remaining 
> from your being stackless, but maybe the pickling. :-)

I don't understand.  If they don't call C extensions then they will have
pure interpreter tasklets with maximum speed and minimum memory, all the
benefits of taskless, right?

I think we have philosophical differences.  I always think "give them
more" but make it work well if they don't use it all.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.