Re: stackless implementation (was Re: New stacklessproposal)
"Mark Hahn" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.prothon.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000401c4691d$747f14b0$0b01a8c0@mark> |
> From: Christian Tismer > > Right now I think the tasklets with C stack copying for one type of > > thread combined with OS threads is a good overall conservative > > combination. If I understand you correctly I can implement > this with > > your basic assembler primitives and by asking lots of questions. :-) > > Wait! > If you reduce it to this, then there is no benefit remaining > from your being stackless, but maybe the pickling. :-) I don't understand. If they don't call C extensions then they will have pure interpreter tasklets with maximum speed and minimum memory, all the benefits of taskless, right? I think we have philosophical differences. I always think "give them more" but make it work well if they don't use it all.