Re: Function once: concern

Paul Prescod <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:49:41 -0700

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.lang.prothon.user
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Lenard Lindstrom wrote:

> A while back it was decided to use the anon, by convension, for declaring
> anonymous function. As such it is just a throw-away name. But this causes
> a problem for anonymous functions with a once: section. 

Another good reason to just dump once: functions. They are basically 
equivalent to conditional statements. Why complicate the language?

init: I like, once: I don't.

  Paul Prescod